<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death Panels and the continued Republican credibility hemorrhage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corinne (Cronkite) Ouellette</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinne (Cronkite) Ouellette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>I would like to know how Walter Cronkite died since we share the same last name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know how Walter Cronkite died since we share the same last name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>Here is another article worth reading.  It is a well-balanced commentary on the whole &quot;death panel&quot; discussion.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703043.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another article worth reading.  It is a well-balanced commentary on the whole &#8220;death panel&#8221; discussion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703043.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.washingtonpost.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703043.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>I recommend the following article, written by Cornell Law Professor, William Jacobson, which explains that Palin&#039;s comment was based on published views of Obama health care advisors, particularly Dr. Ezekial Emanuel (brother of Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel).  Here is an excerpt:

&quot;While Emanuel does not use the term &quot;death panel,&quot; Palin put that term in quotation marks to signify the concept of medical decisions based on the perceived societal worth of an individual, not literally a &quot;death panel.&quot; And in so doing, Palin was true to Dr. Emanuel&#039;s concept of a system which considers prognosis, since its aim is to achieve complete lives. A young person with a poor prognosis has had a few life-years but lacks the potential to live a complete life. Considering prognosis forestalls the concern the disproportionately large amounts of resources will be directed to young people with poor prognoses. When the worst-off can benefit only slightly while better-off people could benefit greatly, allocating to the better-off is often justifiable.... 

&quot;When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.

&quot;Put together the concepts of prognosis and age, and Dr. Emanuel&#039;s proposal reasonably could be construed as advocating the withholding of some level of medical treatment (probably not basic care, but likely expensive advanced care) to a baby born with Down Syndrome. You may not like this implication, but it is Dr. Emanuel&#039;s implication not Palin&#039;s.&quot;

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/08/inconvenient-truth-about-death-panel.html

Secondly, it seems odd and a bit incoherent to assert that there is &quot;no such thing&quot; but that it was a Republican &quot;who wrote the provision into the healthcare bill.&quot;  Maybe you want to clarify...you can&#039;t have it both ways...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend the following article, written by Cornell Law Professor, William Jacobson, which explains that Palin&#8217;s comment was based on published views of Obama health care advisors, particularly Dr. Ezekial Emanuel (brother of Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel).  Here is an excerpt:</p>
<p>&#8220;While Emanuel does not use the term &#8220;death panel,&#8221; Palin put that term in quotation marks to signify the concept of medical decisions based on the perceived societal worth of an individual, not literally a &#8220;death panel.&#8221; And in so doing, Palin was true to Dr. Emanuel&#8217;s concept of a system which considers prognosis, since its aim is to achieve complete lives. A young person with a poor prognosis has had a few life-years but lacks the potential to live a complete life. Considering prognosis forestalls the concern the disproportionately large amounts of resources will be directed to young people with poor prognoses. When the worst-off can benefit only slightly while better-off people could benefit greatly, allocating to the better-off is often justifiable&#8230;. </p>
<p>&#8220;When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.</p>
<p>&#8220;Put together the concepts of prognosis and age, and Dr. Emanuel&#8217;s proposal reasonably could be construed as advocating the withholding of some level of medical treatment (probably not basic care, but likely expensive advanced care) to a baby born with Down Syndrome. You may not like this implication, but it is Dr. Emanuel&#8217;s implication not Palin&#8217;s.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/08/inconvenient-truth-about-death-panel.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/legalinsurrection.blogspot.com');" rel="nofollow">http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/08/inconvenient-truth-about-death-panel.html</a></p>
<p>Secondly, it seems odd and a bit incoherent to assert that there is &#8220;no such thing&#8221; but that it was a Republican &#8220;who wrote the provision into the healthcare bill.&#8221;  Maybe you want to clarify&#8230;you can&#8217;t have it both ways&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2065</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2065</guid>
		<description>I agree with David here. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck - dip it in honey and orange and bake it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with David here. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck &#8211; dip it in honey and orange and bake it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Shankbone</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>David Shankbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>I seriously doubt Mike was a Democratic voter if *this* post made him want to vote Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously doubt Mike was a Democratic voter if *this* post made him want to vote Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleanor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>I hope for that too, Tracy, but apparently it didn&#039;t with Mike, the previous poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope for that too, Tracy, but apparently it didn&#8217;t with Mike, the previous poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>Well done, David. I shared this on Facebook, hopefully it will educate at least a few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, David. I shared this on Facebook, hopefully it will educate at least a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>David Shankbone,
I am an independent (formerly a long time democrat)and after careful review of your comments, I am of the opinion that it should be intuitively obvious to even the most casual observer, that you are full of prunes!
Notwithstanding the above, thank you for validating my decision to leave the democratic party, which has changed from a party that represents middle America to a  party that reprepresents select,far-left-wing interest groups. Get the party out of the far left ditch and back to the middle of the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Shankbone,<br />
I am an independent (formerly a long time democrat)and after careful review of your comments, I am of the opinion that it should be intuitively obvious to even the most casual observer, that you are full of prunes!<br />
Notwithstanding the above, thank you for validating my decision to leave the democratic party, which has changed from a party that represents middle America to a  party that reprepresents select,far-left-wing interest groups. Get the party out of the far left ditch and back to the middle of the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor</title>
		<link>http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/11/death-panels-and-the-continued-republican-credibility-hemorrhage/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleanor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.shankbone.org/?p=2899#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>This just in regarding Glenn Beck, courtesy of The Huffington Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-rucker/geico-pulls-its-ads-from_b_256724.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in regarding Glenn Beck, courtesy of The Huffington Post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-rucker/geico-pulls-its-ads-from_b_256724.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.huffingtonpost.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-rucker/geico-pulls-its-ads-from_b_256724.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.376 seconds -->
