“[M]y baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’“- Sarah Palin, 8/7/09
Republican Death Panels: How many falsehoods can a party spread before it is no longer viable to the electorate?
As if the Republicans’ Teabaggers, Birthers and Screamers weren’t problem enough for its image, now they have the Deathers. The Republican Party is now the embodiment of American fringe politics.
Ever since August 7th when Sarah Palin twittered that her disabled baby would die before the eyes of Obama’s death panels, the Republicans credibility with voters has taken a nose dive (again). At what point does a political party obscure the reality of issues to voters so often, that it can no longer run in elections because it has destroyed all faith and trust in itself?
The Republicans used to rely upon Frank Luntz and Newt Gingrich to help them obfuscate in crafty, disingenuous ways. Now, they flat out lie.
The party’s stars in politics and in their information machine Fox News have hearkened the pending Death Panels who will kill the elderly and Sarah Palin’s baby. Problem: there is no such thing.
In fact, pro-life Republican Johnny Isakson of Georgia is the one who wrote the provision into the healthcare bill. Facing South’s Sue Sturgis unearthed that fact:
Many in the media quickly pointed out that Palin’s claims weren’t true. But Sturgis was the first to report that one of the biggest advocates of counseling for end-of-life care — the provision that actually was in the Congressional legislation — was none other than a pro-life Republican: Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia.
Although one of their own was the architect of the “Death Panels”, Republicans have been going into over drive to tell people that they exist, when they don’t. Isakson is exasperated by his own party:
“I just had a phone call where someone said Sarah Palin’s web site had talked about the House bill having death panels on it where people would be euthanized. How someone could take an end of life directive or a living will as that is nuts. You’re putting the authority in the individual rather than the government. I don’t know how that got so mixed up.”
Are voters wisening-up to Republican tricks to harm the veracity of the national debate over issues, and if so, how long can a party function with no credibility once people realize this is their game plan?
Death Panels and Republican Credibility – a timeline
“By poisoning the political well, they’ve given up any pretense of being the loyal opposition. They’ve become political terrorists, willing to say or do anything to prevent the country from reaching a consensus on one of its most serious domestic problems.” – Steven Pearlstein, Washington Post, 8/7/09
The ‘Death Panel’ provision of Section 1233 of America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, as written by pro-life Republican of Georgia Johnny Isakson:
According to an analysis of the bill produced by the three relevant House committees, the section “[p]rovides coverage for consultation between enrollees and practitioners to discuss orders for life-sustaining treatment. Instructs CMS to modify ‘Medicare & You’ handbook to incorporate information on end-of-life planning resources and to incorporate measures on advance care planning into the physician’s quality reporting initiative.”
June 25, 2009 - Peter Johnson Jr. claimed on Fox & Friends that health care reform is “the government deciding who will live, who will die.” He later went on to ask: “Is that what this plan is about? To save money by killing old people? That’s frightening. That’s absolutely frightening.”
June 26, 2009 - NewsBusters article titled “Obama Says We Shouldn’t Treat Old Folks to Save Money And the Media Goes Deaf,” Warner Todd Huston wrote, “[I]t sure seemed to me as if the most caring, most civil, most intelligent president evah just said that healthcare could be cheaper if we don’t give old folks and the infirm the full measure of care they now get. It appeared that Obama said we should just let them die or suffer because they aren’t worth the effort.”
June 25, 2009 - American Spectator article titled “Obama Wants to Let Those Pesky Geezers Die,” Capital Research Center senior editor Matthew Vadum paraphrased an excerpt from a Los Angeles Times article as stating: “So, old people: screw you”
June 27, 2009 – Forbes on Fox, Forbes publisher Rich Karlgaard misrepresented Obama’s remarks at the health care forum, stating: “[W]hat he’s indicating is that government health care involves rationing. It’s kind of funny that he let it slip out. It was kind of funny he signaled it by wearing a black tie, the color of funerals. There’s going to be more funerals for old people going ahead.”
July 16, 2009 - former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey falsely claimed on Fred Thompson’s show that the House health care reform bill would “absolutely require” end-of-life counseling for seniors “that will tell them how to end their life sooner.”
July 17, 2009 – Betsy McCaughey writes an op-ed for the New York Post repeating false claims, writing “[o]ne troubling provision” of the bill “compels seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years … about alternatives for end-of-life care,” adding that the “mandate invites abuse, and seniors could easily be pushed to refuse care.”
Fox News stars begin spreading the rumor
Sean Hannity: “[I]t sounds to me like they’re actually encouraging seniors in the end, ‘Well, you may just want to consider packing it all in here, this is — ‘ what other way is there to describe this?” He continued, “So that they don’t become a financial burden on the Obamacare system? I mean that’s how they intend to cut cost, by cutting down on the health care we can give and get at the end of our lives and dramatically cutting it down for senior citizens? You know, welcome to the brave new world of Obamacare. We’re going to encourage, you know, inconvenient people to consider ‘alternatives to living.’ ”
Laura Ingraham: “[S]ome will call them death camps, but this is the way Obamacare is gonna go for America.”
August 9, 2009 – Newt Gingrich on This Week -“You’re asking us to decide that the government is to be trusted … You are asking us to trust turning power over to the government, when there are clearly people in American who believe in establishing euthanasia, including selective standards.”
August 9, 2009 – Michelle Malkin – “Death panels? What death panels? Oh, yeah, those death panels.”
August 10, 2009 – Fox & Friends, co-host Brian Kilmeade said, “[E]veryone’s talking about seniors, and they’re talking about the middle class and affordable health care. If the upper class is paying for the next two classes, and are seniors going to be in front of the death panel? And then just as you think, OK, that’s ridiculous, then you realize there’s provisions in there that seniors in the last lap of their life will be sitting there going to a panel possibly discussing what the best thing for them is.”
August 10, 2009 -Glenn Beck on death panels: “I believe it to be true.”
Wikipedia photos to be deleted
NYC Wedding March – September 26, 2010
Joaquin Phoenix is a poser
Flushing Meadow Corona Park skate park
East Village Park and Williamsburg Bridge photos
100 People I Photographed for the Creative Commons
Pakistan flood devastation statistics
Cordoba House / Ground Zero mosque protest photos
The void in my blogging (and some photos)
Rihanna video with Eminem about Chris Brown?
This just in regarding Glenn Beck, courtesy of The Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-rucker/geico-pulls-its-ads-from_b_256724.html
David Shankbone,
I am an independent (formerly a long time democrat)and after careful review of your comments, I am of the opinion that it should be intuitively obvious to even the most casual observer, that you are full of prunes!
Notwithstanding the above, thank you for validating my decision to leave the democratic party, which has changed from a party that represents middle America to a party that reprepresents select,far-left-wing interest groups. Get the party out of the far left ditch and back to the middle of the road.
Well done, David. I shared this on Facebook, hopefully it will educate at least a few.
I hope for that too, Tracy, but apparently it didn’t with Mike, the previous poster.
Twitter: davidshankbone
says:
I seriously doubt Mike was a Democratic voter if *this* post made him want to vote Republican.
I agree with David here. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck – dip it in honey and orange and bake it.
I recommend the following article, written by Cornell Law Professor, William Jacobson, which explains that Palin’s comment was based on published views of Obama health care advisors, particularly Dr. Ezekial Emanuel (brother of Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel). Here is an excerpt:
“While Emanuel does not use the term “death panel,” Palin put that term in quotation marks to signify the concept of medical decisions based on the perceived societal worth of an individual, not literally a “death panel.” And in so doing, Palin was true to Dr. Emanuel’s concept of a system which considers prognosis, since its aim is to achieve complete lives. A young person with a poor prognosis has had a few life-years but lacks the potential to live a complete life. Considering prognosis forestalls the concern the disproportionately large amounts of resources will be directed to young people with poor prognoses. When the worst-off can benefit only slightly while better-off people could benefit greatly, allocating to the better-off is often justifiable….
“When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.
“Put together the concepts of prognosis and age, and Dr. Emanuel’s proposal reasonably could be construed as advocating the withholding of some level of medical treatment (probably not basic care, but likely expensive advanced care) to a baby born with Down Syndrome. You may not like this implication, but it is Dr. Emanuel’s implication not Palin’s.”
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/08/inconvenient-truth-about-death-panel.html
Secondly, it seems odd and a bit incoherent to assert that there is “no such thing” but that it was a Republican “who wrote the provision into the healthcare bill.” Maybe you want to clarify…you can’t have it both ways…
Here is another article worth reading. It is a well-balanced commentary on the whole “death panel” discussion.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703043.html
I would like to know how Walter Cronkite died since we share the same last name.